PDF BASICS 2019 FULL

Military Medical Ethics for the 21st Century is the first full length, broad-based treatment of this important subject. Interduce medical ethics and insist on its importance in medical institutions will positively affect practitioners' knowledge, attitude, and practice.ДЄs asymmetric 'wars among the people' replace state-on-state wars in modern armed conflict, the growing role of military medicine and medical technology in contemporary war fighting has brought an urgent need to critically reassess the theory and practice of military medical ethics. A cogent positive correlation was found between the practice and attitude scores. Females, laboratory specialists/technicians, and those who reported previous study of medical ethics had a significantly higher practice scores. Nursing specialists/technicians, with of 20-<30 years of practice and participants who had previous training in bioethics had significantly higher mean attitude scores than others. Of the participants, 86.9% had studied medical ethics, 70.3% thought patients should know about their rights, 87.4% supported that the patient have the right to know and be informed if any malpractice happened, 61.8% never engaged in healthcare-related act on a patient without informed consent, 73% ensured that no one was present other than medical team during assessments or procedures, and 86.6% tried to give only what was necessary to the patient regarding their situation. A score was given for each response and a total score was calculated. A questionnaire requesting demographic data and items related to the level of knowledge and awareness beside the real-life practice of medical ethics among healthcare providers was used. Medical ethics practice and the attitude and knowledge toward it was our concern and aim to investigate.ДЄ cross-sectional study was conducted on 1943 healthcare practitioners from three tertiary care hospitals.

Pdf basics 2019